Sunday, July 5, 2009

Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy (BDT) Part II with a bit of a bird walk . . .

Continuing on my quest for answers about the pedagogical principles associated with Web 2.0, I want to first consider the idea of collaboration. Collaboration is included in BDT as a separate element see below or click on this link for the full PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/13442504/Blooms-Digital-Taxonomy-v30


Notice collaboration is NOT an integral part of the process; it is NOT necessary for learning to take place. Now, take a step back and think . . . why then is any of this important? Is not Web 2.0 all about collaboration? If it is not part of learning, why is it here? The answer is simple -- 21st Century Skills.

Let's take a short bird walk into twenty-first century. The Partnership for 21st Century skills or P21, has developed a framework of essential skills our students need to be productive citizens in the future. You can probably guess where this is going… Under the Learning and Innovation skills is … TA DA Communication and Collaboration. Effective communication occurs when both the sender and the receiver of the information both understand what is being communicated.

MindTools.com states that a recent survey of large companies by the Katz business School in Pittsburgh PA, communication skills were cited as the single most important skill when selecting managers. Not enough evidence for you? Lets look at Digital-Age Literacy. The Metiri Group, defines the proficiencies students will need to have mastered, and again effective Communication and Collaboration are in the forefront. Digital-Age Literacy includes:

  • basic literacy
  • scientific literacy
  • economic literacy
  • technological literacy
  • visual literacy
  • information literacy
  • multicultural literacy
  • global awareness.
Julie Lindsay, Head of Information and E Learning at Qatar Academy, Doha, State of Qatar and co-founder of the Flat Classroom project states, "Literacy in the 21st century is all about participation: the ability to critically consume and create knowledge for the betterment of ourselves, our families and our communities." Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) are the technologies that used to transmit, store, create and edit the information.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

What is it all About: 21st Century Teaching and Web 2.0, where is the pedagogy in any of this? Part I

While attending NECC in Washington DC last week, I had several conversations that initially frustrated me. I was ecstatic about the conference and the opportunity to be surrounded by some of the best minds in education, those who are willing to work hard and push the envelope to make the education system better. While my enthusiasm did not wane over the course of the week except on one or two instances when I found myself in a presentation that was not holding my attention, my conversations with some peers left me frustrated. I kept hearing about, flashy technology without evidence or pedagogy and the question of why should I change, why should I add some flashy web 2.0 tool to my curriculum?

So I started to look hard, at the workshops I attended, was I just excited about some latest greatest tool? Was I just caught up in the “twitter” and glitz of trends, trends that will soon fade? Or was there more substance to it, was there really research behind the web 2.0 frenzy, was there good solid pedagogy to support all of this?

I think it is important to start with a simple explanation of just what is Web 2.0. I attended several sessions at NECC with Steve Dembo and Steve Hargadon. Each was an excellent presenter who had wonderful ideas on Web 2.0. What I took away from those two sessions in particular was Web 2.0 is: participatory, creative, collaborative, entirely web based, plays well with others, tracks information, and allows you to be more mobile. In other words, you can collaborate any time, any where with anyone around the world, and more often than not, it is FREE!

I wanted to start with the question: “What is the objective of the lesson?” and “what are educators trying to do with all these web 2.0 tools?” Are we simply using them to keep the kids attention, or entertain them while attaining the same mediocre level of student achievement? Or are we able to truly raise the bar for students? The most logical place to start therefore is with Blooms Taxonomy, but not the old taxonomy from the 1950s, the new digital one. Digital one? You ask. Is that not just Bloom’s in a word document? The answer to that is a definitive NO. The new Blooms as revised by Andre Churches is much more than an electronic document. It takes into consideration the web 2.0 tools readily available today. The first notable difference between the two is the use of verbs instead of nouns in the revised taxonomy. For example the first level in the original Blooms was knowledge, in the new Blooms it is remembering.

Why is this important, you might ask? It is important because the change to verbs means a change towards action and doing. The new levels from bottom to top are: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. It somewhat make you think about the NETS for students. Part II will start taking a look at each level of the new Blooms and tying it all together to the NETS. I think when we get to the other side I will have the answer to where is the pedagogy and How this will change the classrooms of the future.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

NECC a view from inside

So how can I describe NECC to someone who has not been to one?  There is no way to describe the ISTE NECCE conference, but to say BOOT CAMP.  A Boot Camp that is for educators from around the world.  The Washington DC Conference Center is swarming with educators from all facets, teachers, administrators, techies, higher-ed, students, you name it and they are there, not just hundreds of them, but thousands of them.  The halls, ballrooms, exhibit halls, floors, not an electrical outlet was left lonely for any length of time, not a wireless system with any room for another person to log into.  If any group can test and take down the best facilities wireless, this group can.  They can also test the food vendors’ capacity to stay stocked, the air condition system to stay on, and the transportation system during rush hour.

            That does not begin to explain the frenzy.  Lets start with the first day, Monday, although it is technically day 3 with two days of “pre-conference” workshops going on, not to mention an excellent keynote speaker, Malcolm Gladwell (we will get to his speech later!).  The selection of events is so comprehensive, and so excellent, you find yourself tossing a coin to pick a session because there are so many great options, and chances are you have been locked out of something at least once during the week dur to maximum capacity.  There are meeting, forums and summits, playgrounds, student showcases, poster sessions, concurrent sessions, spotlights, model lessons, BYOLs, Open source labs, lectures, and panels, research papers, and that is just the morning.  The process never stops, and of course you must visit the exhibit area to meet the vendors, win cool prizes and meet great people.  I am exhausted just typing all of this, just try lugging around a laptop, phone, camera, books you purchases, T-shirts and prizes you won, finding a seat in a program, and actually finding a place to eat, let alone finding a place to eat while your computer is recharging, and you text the family you left behind for the week.

            The question you have to ask is why, why would a reasonable adult sit on the floor stuffin in a lunch in less that 10 minutes, that they stood in line for 30 or more minutes waiting to purchase, while recharging the computer, sending out tweets, and emails, watching other programs going on, making txts and returning calls from the district back home?  Because we care, because we want to become the best, we want to grow the best teams, the best students, and the best classes.  We all have a BHAG, it might not be spelled out, but we all have one.  It is an honor to sit beside some of the most caring, hard working inspirational people in education.  It is a humbling experience, to realize that no matter how good we are, how far we have come, we have so much to learn from each other.  Growing my PLN was not the only growth I experienced this week; by the way, I have two more days to GrOw!

Saturday, June 27, 2009

#NECC09 Pre Conference Day

So, I have arrived in Washington DC for the NECC 09 Conference and have take one day to be a tourist before the Technology unleashes and I don't come up for air until it is over. I plan to immerse myself as much as possible in the glory of the feeding frenzy, although not as much as others might. I call myself an NECC newbie, but did attend in Philly a few years back. At the time I was way too new at all of this and I did not know what to expect. This time, I have tried to plan each day out, knowing full well I will make adjustments, and knowing also I will not be able to see everything I want. That is probably why I left my hotel around 9 AM today and was gone for 10 hours.

The day started with purchasing the "Old Town Trolley" tour ticket and walking to the nearest trolly pick up. Arriving just in time for the FIRST pick up of the day we departed in front of the Willard Hotel. Much to my surprise we discovered there were two events going on in the area, the BBQ cookoff and a Arts Festival. This just added to the to do list for the day. I have never spent significant time in DC, so I had a long to do list. This was my day to see it all. The Trolley took us all over the downtown area, past many beautiful large buildings with important names. We drove past the White House, Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial, Lincoln Memorial, Veitnam Memorial and the Korean War Veterans Memorial. Stopping to walk around several of the sites to quietly pay respects.
The museum list that I visited was quite lengthy as well. The Museum of American History, Natural History Museum, the National Gallery of Art and the Air & Space Museum, all provided shade and cool air as I made my rounds for the day. Of course there was lunch at the BBQ festival and water at the Art Festival. If I could have possible fit more in I would have.
As it turns out our hotel is a hotspot for tourists, Reese Witherspoon and several other big names are filming a move across the street. Maybe I will see stars this week. I have to say I am looking forward to the opening night keynote speaker and all of the events I have scheduled for this up coming week. I did survive my day without much technology, only a cell phone to text my kids back home and of course a camera to document my travels.
As I toured the city, I could not help but think about the options of documenting my trip for a digital story, and how I could create one on many different platforms. To name just a few there is PhotoStory3, Voicethread, blabberize, and of course using my MAC, which by the way is my favorite. I think blabberize would be good for short stories for younger age groups, while photostory is free, voice thread is online and the MAC I have to admit is the more expensive of the choices, but still my favorite. I also thought of a Geocaching project, and many others, so while my day was for sight seeing, I was still processing what you could do educationally with all of this stuff.
Time to rest and get ready for the week, I am sure I will be thinking in my sleep, a habit I cannot seem to break right now. Web 2.0 and new technologies are like riding the rapids, blink and you will be bumped off the boat, floating down the river without a paddle.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

What was life like BG? . . . Before Google

So there has been much debate and bantering about the use of Google and its validity in my recent grad course. It got me thinking. I have not been a proponent of Google per say, but I have found myself more of an admirer lately and I have to stop and think why, and is this really good?

Am I just using Google because it is the easiest way to find something or are there some other reasons that draw me to that URL? This will require some thought. The first thing I noticed about the Google search engine, way back when (1998) was the lack of clutter. Being a digital immigrant who is somewhat comfortable with technology, I am distracted by the clutter on other search engine pages. I like the simple straight forward look of Google. I can get in, get what I want without being distracted and drawn to other sites. Does this make me ADD? I am not sure, I will have to research that question later!

After my initial experiences with Google, I have started to appreciate the assortment of tools and gadgets offered by Google and the possibilities it presents. Google Scholar, Maps, Reader, Earth, Calendar, Documents and Gmail have become some of my latest favorites. I see the value in such collaborative tools for the educational community. Twitter and Blogs are full of great tips and ideas for educators Barely a day goes by without seeing someone twitter or blog about the latest, greatest uses of something Google related.

So what is wrong with using Google? If you are looking for credible, information that is research based, you might have to look deeper. Google gives results by popularity of a site, it is therefore not always the best tool to use. Sometimes when you are looking for something specific, it it better to go to a smaller specialty store, the same can be true for search engines.
If you are looking for what search engine to use under different circumstances the best resource I have found is NoodleTools : http://www.noodletools.com . Here you will find recommendations on what search engine to use under a variety of circumstances. Whether you need to do research in a specific area, find the best primary sources, or find timelines, NoodleTools will lead you in the right direction. The list of research options seems limitless.

So is Google good or bad? I will have to leave that up to you.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Remember when . . .

I cannot seem to remember what life was like BGS (before graduate school).  I have only been at this for 3 weeks, yet I feel like I have been at it forever, did I have a life before this?  Not sure.
So, we have to prepare a literature review of sorts, a precursor to our graduate studies.  The problem is . . .  I have no idea what to study . . . HA HA.  So where do I go from here?  IDK maybe I should take a step back and just think.  Ok, long enough, I think I have too many fragmented thoughts to process or narrow all this down to just one idea.  So, i thought I should start with my questions...

  •  What does research tell us about the best practices for preservice programs?  How should they be defined and designed? I need details.
  • Why do my thoughts keep returning to TPACK?  Technology, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge?  and I keep hearing a voice in my head . . .  "technology should not be the driving force.  The goal cannot be to simply infuse technology for technologies sake." 
 What is the goal then?
I believe we must look at what are the needs of K-12 schools?  Which sends me to what are the needs of the students?  What are the goals of the K-12 schools.  UGH!  At times like this I feel like the moose in  "If you give a Moose a Muffin". 




Wednesday, May 27, 2009